ГДЗ по Английскому Языку 11 Класс Модуль 5 Going Green Номер 4 Ваулина — Подробные Ответы

Работайте в двух группах: те, кто за Зеленые пояса, и те, кто против. Используйте текст, чтобы помочь подготовить дебаты в классе.

Group 1 — Arguments in Favor of Green Belts

Green belts enhance the visual appeal of the country and help prevent uncontrolled urban expansion.

They provide green open spaces with fresh air where people can relax and enjoy nature away from the busy city life.

These areas serve as important habitats for a variety of wildlife species.

Trees and plants in green belts help to purify the air by reducing pollution levels.

Group 2 — Arguments Against Green Belts

Too much land is currently reserved for green belts, which could be better used to accommodate the growth of cities and towns.

Some parts of the green belts are unattractive and could be developed for housing or commercial purposes.

Traffic congestion caused by commuters traveling through green belt areas to reach urban centers leads to increased air pollution.

Wildlife habitats are better protected in designated nature reserves rather than green belts, which mainly serve to restrict urban sprawl.

Detailed Discussion on Green Belts: Arguments For and Against

Green belts are designated areas of undeveloped, wild, or agricultural land surrounding cities and towns, intended to limit urban sprawl and protect the natural environment. However, opinions about green belts vary widely, with strong arguments on both sides.

Arguments in Favor of Green Belts
Supporters of green belts emphasize their important role in preserving the environment and improving quality of life. One of the main benefits is that green belts maintain the natural beauty of the countryside around urban areas, preventing cities from expanding uncontrollably into rural land. This restriction helps to protect farmland, forests, and natural habitats, maintaining biodiversity.

Green belts provide essential green open spaces for city dwellers, offering fresh air and peaceful areas where people can relax, exercise, and enjoy outdoor recreational activities. These green spaces improve mental and physical health by allowing residents to escape the noise and pollution of urban life.

Moreover, green belts serve as critical habitats for many species of wildlife, including birds, mammals, insects, and plants. Trees and vegetation within green belts also play a key role in improving air quality by absorbing carbon dioxide and other pollutants, thus reducing the impact of urban air pollution.

Arguments Against Green Belts
Opponents argue that green belts consume large areas of land that could be used more effectively to address housing shortages and support urban growth. In many countries, particularly those facing rapid population increases, there is a significant demand for new homes, and critics claim that strict green belt policies limit the supply of available land for development, contributing to high property prices.

Another criticism is that some portions of green belts consist of neglected or unattractive land that does not provide much ecological or recreational value. Developing these areas could improve their appearance and make better use of space near cities.

Traffic congestion is also a major concern linked to green belts. Because green belts restrict urban expansion, many people are forced to live farther away from city centers, resulting in longer commutes. These longer journeys increase vehicle emissions and contribute to higher levels of pollution, somewhat counteracting the environmental benefits of green belts.

Finally, some argue that the primary purpose of protecting wildlife habitats should be fulfilled by designated nature reserves or national parks rather than green belts. Nature reserves are often more carefully managed for conservation, while green belts mainly serve as buffers to control city growth.